are no data that come anywhere nearrnKinsey. And Kinsev’s survey was fatallyrnflawed. He used an enormous numberrnof conviets, many of them sex offenders.rnHe used hundreds of male prostrni t u t e s . He prowled the gav bars inrnseareh of people with the most bizarrernstories. If you don’t believe me, you canrncheck the biography by Kinsey’s co-author,rnWardell Pomcroy.”rnThe first hint of uncertainty flickeredrnin the queer warrior’s eves. I began tornfeel sorry for him. I le honest-to-goodnessrndid not know he had been fed arnpack of lies by the homosexual movement,rnthe same lies that the media hasrnbeen echoing for the past four decades.rnMy mind reeled. How many politiciansrnlive in fear of the phantom 10 percentrnof voters that might retaliate if homosexualrnactivists are not appeased?rnHoyv many parents acquiesce to publicrnschool indoctrination of their childrenrnin anal sex at the behest of sex educatorsrnwielding the Kinsey statistics? Howrnmany homosexuals waste away, believingrnthey can’t change? I low many knowrnthat homosexuality might not have tornbe the sole or defining element in theirrnlives?rnThe lima pulled up to the studio, andrnwe exchanged final volleys. As I got outrnof the car, I looked at mv opponent, whornwas strangely reticent. Had I eonvuieedrnhim of anything? No. I had no illusionsrnabout that. Without having seen hisrnshow taped, I have little doubt that hernwent in and socked it to the L. A. pastor.rnHow could he not, having so much stakernin it? The queer warrior made me thinkrnof Stanlc) Baldwin, of whom WinstonrnChurchill said (and I paraphrase); “Stanleyrnoccasionally stumbles over the truth.rnBut he always manages to pick himselfrnup and hurry on as if nothing had happened.”rnSince he did not have to tape for arncouple of hours, the queer warrior askedrnthe linro driver to take him to his hotel.rnJust before the door closed, he saidrngoodbye, and his arm flinched, as if hernwere about to offer his hand but thoughtrnbetter of it. I did the same. Then wernlooked at each other for a second andrnput out our hands. If this were scriptedrnby liberal bleeding hearts, we would thenrnhave hugged and begun to sing “We Arernthe World.” No, there wasn’t any phonyrncamaraderie, but it was clear there wasrnno enmity either. And that may havernsurprised both of us. I know it surprisedrnme. These guys look scary on thernevening news. We shook hands, and thernlimo drove off.rnI walked up the steps into the studio,rnturning my thoughts to the bizarre menrnin dresses who would share the stagernwith me. One would bring a son, anotherrnhis wife, and a third his fiancee.rnThe audience would be drugged withrnthe usual rhetoric of ultratolerance, andrnI yvas to play the role of the bigot. Atrnleast, that was the set-up. It wasn’t fair,rnbut that was O. K. Somehoyv, I was nowrnmore confident that just telling therntruth in this strange age may be enough.rnRobert Knight is director of thernCultural Studies Project atrnthe Family Research Council inrnWashington, D.C.rnThere are many ways to give to educational and ctiaritable organizations such as the Rockford Institute, publisher of Chronicles: ArnMagazine of American Culture. Most people make direct gifts which result in a “charitable deduction” from their taxable income inrna given year. But there are other ways to give that can preserve income or assets for a donor and his beneficiaries, avoid capitalrngains and estate taxes, and benefit the Institute or other charities. These are often referred to as “planned gifts.”rnThe Rockford Institute’s Pooled Income Fund provides income to a donor or his beneficiary and can be initiated at the $5,000rnlevel or above. The amount in the fund can be increased each year, and the amount of income depends on the performance of thernpooled fund. This fund has both high Income and growth-oriented investments, and the return is generally much higher than stockrndividends. The amount of charitable tax deduction for the gift depends on the fair market value of the assets contributed (there isrnno capital gains tax on stock contributions) and is related to the age of the donor or beneficiaries. There is no capital gains tax forrnthe donor on the increased value of the fund over time. Upon the death of the donor or beneficiary, the assets would bypass estaterntaxes and go to the Institute.rnMichael Warder, Legacy Program, The Rockford Institute, 934 North Main Street, Rocliford, IL 61103rnI 1 Please send me general information on “Planned Giving” options.rnr n Please send me information on the Institute’s Pooled Income Fund.rnNAME_rnCITYrnADDRESS_rnSTATE_ ZIP PHONE_rnIf yuu have a specifie asset, such as stocks, that you are considering for a contribution, and if you would like the Institute to evaluate the financial tax implications forrnyour gift, please include Che following information;rnSS#_ SS #(SPOUSE)_rnCOST OF ASSET_ ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE_rn50/CHRONlCLESrnrnrn