or l)t’en compared to Stalin, Mao, or PolrnPot, een though the ieiousness of theserntotalitarian leaders tar outstripped, at leastrnin numbers, the atrocities perpetrated b’rnthe Nazis.rnOne of the reasons for this strange partialitrnis the international character ofrnconnnunism. Both the defunct Cominternrnand the Gramscian New WorldrnOrder are explicith- “internationalist”rnmoxements aimed at the disintegrationrnof independent nations. Nazism, on thernother hand, was a peculiarly nationalistrnnioement exalting, to tiie point of idolatr,rnone nation at the expense of eer’rnother. But for the one-w orld socialist andrnpantheistic order, individual nations, orrngrou|;s of nations, are an obstacle to itsrngrand design, and they must either be absorbedrninto the greater whole or, if theyrnresist such assimilation, face utter destruction.rnThus, the independence of indirnidual nations who seek to defend theirrnnational soereignt}’ must be broken and,rnif the resist, their autonomy mu.st be destrorned b force.rn1 he internationalist conglomerate,rnnow isibl- headed h the United States,rnwaged a rhirt Years War against the independentrnRepublic of South Africa.rnThis w ar of attrition saw the final defeatrnof the beleaguered Boer Republicrndirough the betraal of the eountr’s ownrngo ernment. Soutii Mrica thus became arnwilling ictini to the seductions of thernNew World Order. But no one toda}-rnseems bothered bv the fact that violencernin that eountr has increased to unprecedentedrnleels and that the present conditionrnof the black majority- population isrn(in spite ot a er’ real social liberation)rnmuch w orse off than it w as but a few earsrnago under white hrannwrnThe C^.nlf War waged by the firstrnAmerican president openK- to proclaimrnthe irtucs of the New World O r d e r -rnGeorge Bush, Sr. —let the Muslim nationsrnknow what would happen to them ifrnthe- succumbed to the temptation of resistingrnthe apparently irresistible might ofrnHie new Pax Americdna.rn1 he go”ernment of m- own eountr,rnSwitzerland, long known for its loe ofrnfreedom and of an independence strong-rn1- buttressed h a foreign poliev of armedrnneutrality and actie diplomacy, was inrnthree short cars brought to heel by a media-rndrien war waged b- an unhoh’ alliancernmade up of the American governmentrnand certain rapacious (andrnthoronghh- mendacious) internationalrnJewisii organizations, the latter totalK’rncontemptuous of the moral standards ofrnthe Torah. This international hijackingrnof the Swiss banks was conducted underrnthe pretext of certain (in part genuine) injusticesrnsuffered bv survivors of the holocaustrnand their descendants. The indecentrnabuse of die great sufferings of theirrnown people by certain Jewish publicistsrnin order to attack Switzerland provokedrnthe indignation of the Sw iss Jew ish commmntvrnand vehement protests from arnnumber of Israeli journalists, who couldrnnot understand how their fellow Jewsrncould hirn the sufferings of their ancestorsrninto a monev-making racket. Our totalrncapitulation to this American-led internationalrncabal was only prevented brnour system of direct democracv, imdcrrnwhich all major issues are decided bvrnpopular referendum. The leader of thernpatriotic resistance is a successful businessmanrnof strongly antisocialfst convictionsrnfrom the Grisons, ChristophernBloeher, who —for his love of die independencernof his country—has been publiclv-rnidentified with Adolf Phtier by membersrnof our Federal Council who arernshort on rational arguments. The intellectual,rnbusiness, and political nomenvlatiirarnof mv’ country has largelv beenrnwon over to tiie ideology of our Americaledrninternational socialist ruling elite (Internazis,rnfor short).rnEven a cursory glance at the foreignrnpolicy of the present government of thernUnited States reveals its intrinsicallv anti-rnChristian character. This is evident atrnleast as far back as 1945 and comes outrnvery clearlv from the actions undertakenrnin the past ten ears bv the Lfuited Statesrnin die Balkans. In this cultural and internationalrndisaster, the United States hasrnsided with die forces of Islam against allrnother parties in the conflict (widi the exceptionrnof the Croats) who in any wav refleetedrnHie slightest Christian heritage.rnSince NATO’s occupation of Kosovo,rnvviiich contains the greatest concentrationrnof Christian churches and monasteriesrnin the world, more Christian monumentsrnhave been destroyed than duringrnthe many centuries of Ottoman occupationrnof the Balkans.rnUnited States policv’ in this region followsrna hvo-pronged geopolitical strategv,rndie crucial clement of which is die use ofrnIslam as a battering ram. One prongrnaims at die soft Muslim undcrbellv ofrnRussia —its interminable soudiern frontierrn—while the other counts on thernabundant Islamic migrant population inrnmost of the nations of Western Europe asrna potential fifdi column. The center pinrnof this strategv is die establishment of arnstrong Islamic political base in die Balkansrn—Bosnia and Greater Albania —underrnstiiet U.S./NA’PO patronage. Therntragedv- is that most of the governments ofrnWestern Europe have gone over to diernenemy, becoming willing allies — orrnsatellites —of riic United States. One ofrnthe rare statesmen to have understoodrnthe U.S. threat to the independent existencernof the F.uropcan nations was diernlate Francois Mitterrand who, in his PoliticalrnTestament, explicidv stated that thernU.S. government was effectively, if notrnopenly, at war widi France.rnIn attempting to account for the persfstentlvrnanti-Christian slant in Americanrnforeign policv, Robert A. Pois’s pathbreakingrnbook National Socialism andrnthe Religion of Nature is of great use. Accordingrnto Pois, die Nazi religion of naturernrejected all distinctions, e.g., betweenrnman and animals, good and evil,rnGod and man, truth and lies. It also rejectedrntraditional moralih and elevatedrnthe emotional and instinctual at die expensernof the rational. This neo-pagan religiousrnideologv can be compared to certainrnaspects of the hv per-emotional andrnilluminist, irrational and antinomian religionrnso prevalent in important segmentsrnof American Christianih’, especiallv’ in itsrncharismatic expression. One is struck byrna number of fundamental similarities: anrnaccent on a monistic unih; a refusal ofrndie controlling use of reason; a defense ofrnemotion and instinct at the expense of intelligencernand wisdom; an antinoniianismrnand a passionate justification of thernauthentic as source of the true and therngood; a continual confusion of C^od andrnman, of the spiritual widi the material; anrnignorance of the true nature of sin and ofrnevil in the world.rnPhis religious state of affairs in part explainsrnthe absence of real resistancernamong American churches to Hie totallyrnamoral—but no doubt cn/^/je/;/^/c —publiernand private actions of v our currentrnpresident. It also explains the contemptrnfor law, for established rules of conduct,rnfor solemnly signed and ratified internationalrntreaties, for any kind of decency,rnfor truth itself, so rampant in die behaviorrnof the current administration. Woe torndie nations of die world that have to submitrnto such a nation!rnIt is the amoraliU—standing as thev dornbeyond good and e v i l – o f such publicrnfigures as Ted ‘Punier and William JeffersonrnClinton which explains the brutal.rnIDLY 2000,’4!rnrnrn